Search This Blog

Showing posts with label investment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label investment. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 January 2024

The Economist examines India's Economic Performance

 From The Economist


In the second week of 2024 business leaders descended on Gujarat, the home state of Narendra Modi, India’s prime minister. The occasion was the Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit, one of many gabfests at which India has courted global investors. “At a time when the world is surrounded by many uncertainties, India has emerged as a new ray of hope,” boasted Mr Modi at the event.

He is right. Although global growth is expected to slow from 2.6% last year to 2.4% in 2024, India appears to be booming. Its economy grew by 7.6% in the 12 months to the third quarter of 2023, beating nearly every forecast. Most economists expect an annual growth rate of 6% or more for the rest of this decade. Investors are seized by optimism.

The timing is good for Mr Modi. In April some 900m Indians will be eligible to vote in the largest election in world history. A big reason Mr Modi, who has been in office since 2014, is likely to win a third term is that many Indians think him a more competent manager of the world’s fifth-largest economy than they do any other candidate. Are they right?

To assess Mr Modi’s record The Economist has analysed India’s economic performance and the success of his biggest reforms. In many respects the picture is muddy—and not helped by sparse and poorly kept official data. Growth has outpaced that of most emerging economies, but India’s labour market remains weak and private-sector investment has disappointed. But that may be changing. Aided by Mr Modi’s reforms, India may be on the cusp of an investment boom that would pay off for years.

The headline growth figures reveal surprisingly little. India’s gdp per person, after adjusting for purchasing power, has grown at an average pace of 4.3% per year during Mr Modi’s decade in power. That is lower than the 6.2% achieved under Manmohan Singh, his predecessor, who also served for ten years.

image: the economist

But this slowdown was not Mr Modi’s doing: much of it is down to the bad hand he inherited. In the 2010s an infrastructure boom started to go sour. India faced what Arvind Subramanian, later a government adviser, has called a twin balance-sheet crisis, one that struck both banks and infrastructure firms. They were left loaded with bad debt, crimping investment for years afterwards. Mr Modi also took office at a time when global growth had slowed, scarred by the financial crisis of 2007-09. Then came the covid-19 pandemic. The difficult conditions meant average growth among 20 other large lower- and middle-income economies fell from 3.2% during Mr Singh’s time in office to 1.6% during Mr Modi’s. Compared with this group, India has continued to outperform (see chart 1).

Against such a turbulent backdrop, it is better to assess Mr Modi’s record by considering his stated economic objectives: to formalise the economy, improve the ease of doing business and boost manufacturing. On the first two, he has made progress. On the third, his results have so far been poor.

India’s economy has certainly become more formal under Mr Modi, albeit at a high cost. The idea has been to draw activity out of the shadow economy, which is dominated by small and inefficient firms that do not pay tax, and into the formal sphere of large, productive companies.

Mr Modi’s most controversial policy on this front has been demonetisation. In 2016 he banned the use of two large-value banknotes, accounting for 86% of rupees in circulation—surprising many even within his government. The stated aim was to render worthless the ill-gotten gains of the corrupt. But almost all the cash made its way into the banking system, suggesting that crooks had already gone cashless or laundered their money. Instead, the informal economy was crushed. Household investment and credit plunged, and growth was probably hurt. In private, even Mr Modi’s supporters in business do not mince words. “It was a disaster,” says one boss.

Demonetisation may have accelerated India’s digitisation nonetheless. The country’s digital public infrastructure now includes a universal identity scheme, a national payments system and a personal-data management system for things like tax documents. It was conceived by Mr Singh’s government, but much of it has been built under Mr Modi, who has shown the capacity of the Indian state to get big projects done. Most retail payments in cities are now digital, and most welfare transfers seamless, because Mr Modi gave almost all households bank accounts.

Those reforms made it easier for Mr Modi to ameliorate the poverty resulting from India’s disappointing job-creation record. Fearing that stubbornly low employment would stop living standards for the poorest from improving, the government now doles out welfare payments worth some 3% of gdp per year. Hundreds of government programmes send money directly to the bank accounts of the poor.

It is a big improvement on the old system, in which most welfare was distributed physically and, owing to corruption, often failed to reach its intended recipients. The poverty rate (the proportion of people living on less than $2.15 a day), has fallen from 19% in 2015 to 12% in 2021, according to the World Bank.

Digitisation has probably also drawn more economic activity into the formal sector. So has Mr Modi’s other signature economic policy: a national goods and services tax (gst), passed in 2017, which knitted together a patchwork of state levies across the country. The combination of homogenous payments and tax systems has brought India closer to a national single market than ever.

That has made doing business easier—Mr Modi’s second objective. gst has been a “game-changer”, says B. Santhanam, the regional boss of Saint-Gobain, a large French manufacturer with big investments in the southern state of Tamil Nadu. “The prime minister gets it,” adds another seasoned manufacturing executive, referring to the need to cut red tape. The government has also put serious money into physical infrastructure, such as roads and bridges. Public investment surged from around 3.5% of gdp in 2019 to nearly 4.5% in 2022 and 2023.

The results are now materialising. Mr Subramanian recently wrote that, as a share of gdp, in 2023 net revenues from the new tax regime exceeded those of the old system. This happened even as tax rates on many items fell. That more money is coming in despite lower rates suggests that the economy really is formalising.

Yet Mr Modi is not satisfied with merely formalising the economy. His third objective has been to industrialise it. In 2020 the government launched a subsidy scheme worth $26bn (1% of gdp) for products made in India. In 2021 it pledged $10bn for semiconductor companies to build plants domestically. One boss notes that Mr Modi personally takes the trouble to convince executives to invest, often in industries where they face little competition and so otherwise might not.

image: the economist

Some incentives could help new industries find their feet and show foreign bosses that India is open for business. In September Foxconn, Apple’s main supplier, said it would double its investments in India over the coming year. It currently makes some 10% of its iPhones there. Also in 2023 Micron, a chipmaker, began work on a $2.75bn plant in Gujarat that is expected to create some 5,000 jobs directly and 15,000 indirectly.

So far, however, these projects are too small to be economically significant. The value of manufactured exports as a share of gdp has stagnated at 5% over the past decade, and manufacturing’s share of the economy has fallen from about 18% under the previous government to 16%. And industrial policy is expensive. The government will bear 70% of the cost of the Micron plant—meaning it will pay nearly $100,000 per job. Tariffs are ticking up, on average, raising the cost of foreign inputs.

image: the economist











So what matters more: Mr Modi’s failures or his successes? As well as economic growth, it is worth looking at private-sector investment. It has been sluggish during Mr Modi’s time in office (see chart 2). But a boom may be coming. A recent report by Axis Bank, one of India’s largest lenders, argues that the private-investment cycle is likely to turn, thanks to healthy bank and corporate balance-sheets. Announcements of new investment projects by private corporations soared past $200bn in 2023, according to the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, a think-tank. That is the highest in a decade, and up 150% in nominal terms since 2019.

Although higher interest rates have sapped foreign direct investment in the past year, firms’ reported intentions to invest in India remain strong, as they seek to “de-risk” their exposure to China. There is some chance, then, that Mr Modi’s reforms will kick growth up a gear. If so, he will have earned his reputation as a successful economic manager.

The consequences of Mr Modi’s policies will take years to be felt in full. Just as an investment boom could vindicate his approach, his strategy of using welfare payments as a substitute for job creation could prove unsustainable. A failure to build local governments’ capacity to provide basic public services, such as education, may hinder growth. Subhash Chandra Garg, a former finance secretary under Mr Modi, worries that the government is too keen on “subsidies” and “freebies”, and that its “commitment to real reforms is no longer that strong.” And yet for all that, many Indians will go to the polls feeling cautiously optimistic about the economic changes that their prime minister has wrought.

Saturday, 12 August 2023

China’s recent economic woes suggest there is something seriously amiss

George Magnus in The Guardian

At a Politburo meeting last month, China’s leaders referred to the economic recovery this year as “torturous”. You won’t often hear such candour coming from a Chinese Communist party institution, let alone such an elevated body. They were referring to current conditions, of course, but China’s problems reveal much that is systemically out of kilter in its economic and political system.

During the past few days, some of the statistics China has published have caused a stir. Consumer prices in July were lower than a year ago, suggesting it might be on the cusp of deflation, which reflects a chronic shortage of demand in the economy. And China’s foreign trade in the same month showed a sharp fall in exports due to weak global demand, with a sharper decline in imports signifying weakness in demand at home. There were murky factors affecting both but the message is that something more serious is amiss in China.


Indeed, China was widely expected to bounce back from the pandemic and there was a bit of a flurry early in 2023. Yet, consumption has generally been very subdued especially for big-ticket items such as cars and houses, and private investment, the backbone of China’s economy, fell in the first half of this year, for the first time since such data was published many years ago.

Private firms and entrepreneurs are not spending much on investment or on hiring people. Youth unemployment has topped 21%, or double what it is in the UK and almost three times the rate in the US. The annual graduation of 11-12 million students in the the summer is aggravating an already difficult situation because of the problems of finding suitable work, and also because the Chinese labour market has become one in which most jobs are in the lower-pay, low-skill, gig or informal economy compared with higher quality jobs in manufacturing and construction.

It would be wrong though to pin this all on the pandemic. Most things weighing on China’s economy have been building for several years, even while much of the world was wowed by China’s global brands such as Huawei, Alibaba, Tencent and TikTok, property was booming, and China was leaving its footprint all over the world through the “belt and road” initiative and its rising governance engagement with global entities such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Health Organization.

In spite of its unequivocal accomplishments and successes, China has, during the past decade or more, spawned a mountain of bad debt, unprofitable and uncommercial infrastructure and real estate, empty apartment blocks and little-used apartments and transport facilities, and excess capacity in, for example, coal, steel, solar panels and electric vehicles. Productivity growth has stalled, and China can unfortunately boast one of the world’s highest levels of inequality.

It is ageing faster than any other country on the planet but with a skinny social security system in which most of its 290 million migrant workers are not eligible for most social benefits. Under Xi Jinping, moreover, it has also developed an increasingly repressive, state-centric and controlling governance system, both for political reasons and to deal with the effects of its failing development model.

These are testing times for Chinese citizens, especially the fabled rising middle class whose savings have mostly found a home in an outsized real estate sector which has now entered a period of structural decline. Most of the housing stock, overbuilding, collapse in transactions and weakness in prices are not in big agglomerations such as Beijing, Shenzhen and Shanghai, but in hundreds of smaller cities and towns that rarely make news.

China’s leaders have been vocal this year about strengthening consumption and about improving the business environment for private firms and entrepreneurs, who have been pressured or punished to align their commercial interest with the party’s political goals. We still await evidence that such rhetoric has substance.

In the coming weeks and months, we should probably expect the authorities to ease financial and budgetary policies, housing regulations, and borrowing caps to finance infrastructure. There might even be measures that look consumer-friendly but also fail to boost the income that alone can sustain higher consumption.

These things may give the economy a temporary lift over the winter but the underlying weakness of the economy and the greater authoritarianism that China features are now two sides of the same coin that seem irreversible, certainly for the time being.

It is a moot point whether this sort of China in the 2020s is a bigger threat to geopolitical stability than one in which it confidently strides the world stage and is able to brush aside liberal leaning democracies and reframe global governance in its interests. But a crucial one to get right.

Tuesday, 25 July 2023

A Level Economics: Practice Questions on Supply-side Policies

 MCQs

  1. Supply side policies aim to improve the productive capacity of an economy by: a) Increasing government spending b) Controlling inflation c) Boosting aggregate demand d) Enhancing the quantity and quality of factors of production Solution: d) Enhancing the quantity and quality of factors of production


  2. Which of the following is an example of a supply side policy? a) Increasing government welfare programs b) Reducing interest rates c) Increasing taxes on luxury goods d) Promoting investment in human capital through education and training Solution: d) Promoting investment in human capital through education and training


  3. Supply side policies can lead to long-term economic growth by: a) Increasing short-term aggregate demand b) Reducing taxes for the wealthy c) Expanding the economy's productive potential d) Encouraging imports over exports Solution: c) Expanding the economy's productive potential


  4. How do supply side policies differ from demand side policies? a) Supply side policies focus on increasing government spending, while demand side policies focus on reducing taxes. b) Supply side policies aim to increase the quantity and quality of factors of production, while demand side policies focus on influencing aggregate demand. c) Supply side policies aim to control inflation, while demand side policies aim to reduce unemployment. d) Supply side policies are only relevant during economic recessions, while demand side policies are applicable during economic expansions. Solution: b) Supply side policies aim to increase the quantity and quality of factors of production, while demand side policies focus on influencing aggregate demand.


  5. Which of the following is a limitation of supply side policies? a) They can lead to high inflation. b) They may cause a decline in aggregate demand. c) They may exacerbate income inequality. d) They are only effective in the short run. Solution: c) They may exacerbate income inequality.


  6. A country's supply side policies include reducing regulations, investing in infrastructure, and promoting research and development. Which of the following is a likely outcome of these policies? a) Increased government budget deficit b) Reduced economic growth c) Higher productivity and innovation d) Increased trade barriers Solution: c) Higher productivity and innovation


  7. The "Marshall Lerner condition" states that a currency depreciation will improve the trade balance if: a) The sum of the price elasticities of demand for exports and imports is greater than one. b) The sum of the price elasticities of demand for exports and imports is equal to one. c) The sum of the price elasticities of demand for exports and imports is less than one. d) The sum of the price elasticities of demand for exports and imports is negative. Solution: a) The sum of the price elasticities of demand for exports and imports is greater than one.


  8. The "J curve effect" refers to: a) The long-term improvement of trade balance after a currency depreciation. b) The immediate improvement of trade balance after a currency depreciation. c) The short-term worsening of trade balance after a currency depreciation. d) The immediate improvement of trade balance after a currency appreciation. Solution: c) The short-term worsening of trade balance after a currency depreciation.


  9. How do supply side policies impact a country's production possibilities frontier (PPF)? a) They cause the PPF to shift inward, indicating reduced production capacity. b) They have no effect on the PPF. c) They shift the PPF outward, indicating increased production capacity. d) They cause the PPF to become a straight line instead of a curve. Solution: c) They shift the PPF outward, indicating increased production capacity.


  10. Which of the following is an advantage of holding exchange rates artificially low? a) Reduced export competitiveness b) Improved export competitiveness c) Increased imports and trade deficits d) Higher interest rates Solution: b) Improved export competitiveness

---

Long Answer Questions

  1. Analyze the historical context and economic challenges that led to the prominence of supply side policies during the 1980s in the United States and the United Kingdom, and evaluate the long-term impact of "Reaganomics" and "Thatcherism" on their respective economies.


  2. Evaluate the effectiveness of supply side policies in promoting economic growth and addressing income inequality, considering their impact on factors such as labor market reforms, investment in human and physical capital, and research and development incentives.


  3. Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of artificially managing exchange rates to improve export competitiveness. Assess the potential risks associated with holding exchange rates artificially low and its impact on inflation, import costs, and speculative activities.


  4. Discuss the concept of the "Marshall Lerner condition" and the "J curve effect" concerning exchange rate changes. Evaluate their relevance and implications for trade balances and the overall economic stability of a country.


  5. Considering the impact of supply side policies on the production possibilities frontier (PPF), aggregate demand (AD), and aggregate supply (AS), compare and contrast the effectiveness of supply side measures with demand side policies in achieving long-term economic growth and stability. Analyze their respective limitations and potential trade-offs.

Friday, 21 July 2023

A Level Economics 72: Aggregate Demand

Aggregate Demand (AD) refers to the total demand for all goods and services in an economy at a given price level and period of time. It represents the total spending by households, businesses, government, and foreign buyers on domestically produced goods and services.

The components of aggregate demand are as follows: C+I+G+(X-M)

  1. Consumption (C): Consumption is the total spending by households on goods and services for personal use. It includes purchases like food, clothing, housing, healthcare, and leisure activities. Consumption is the largest component of aggregate demand in most economies.

  2. Investment (I): Investment represents spending by businesses on capital goods, such as machinery, equipment, and buildings, to expand production capacity and enhance future productivity.

  3. Government Spending (G): Government spending is the expenditure by the government on public goods and services, welfare programs, infrastructure projects, education, and healthcare.

  4. Net Exports (X-M): Net exports represent the difference between a country's exports (X) and imports (M). Exports are goods and services sold to foreign markets, while imports are goods and services purchased from foreign markets.

Factors Affecting Each Component of Aggregate Demand:

1. Consumption (C):

  • Disposable Income: The level of disposable income (income after taxes) influences consumption. As disposable income increases, households have more money available for spending, leading to higher consumption.
  • Consumer Confidence: Positive consumer confidence encourages spending, as people are more likely to spend when they feel optimistic about the economy and their future.
  • Interest Rates: Lower interest rates can encourage borrowing for consumption purposes, as it becomes cheaper to finance purchases with credit.
  • Wealth and Asset Prices: Increases in wealth, such as rising home or stock prices, can lead to higher consumption as households feel wealthier and are more willing to spend.

2. Investment (I):

  • Interest Rates: Lower interest rates reduce the cost of borrowing for investment projects, encouraging businesses to undertake capital expenditures.
  • Business Confidence: High business confidence and favorable economic conditions can increase business willingness to invest in expanding their operations.
  • Technological Advancements: Opportunities for improved productivity through new technologies can incentivize firms to invest in upgrading their equipment and processes.

3. Government Spending (G):

  • Fiscal Policy: Government spending decisions are influenced by fiscal policy objectives, such as stimulating economic growth, providing public goods, and addressing social welfare needs.
  • Political Priorities: Government spending can be influenced by political priorities, such as investment in infrastructure, education, and healthcare.

4. Net Exports (X-M):

  • Exchange Rates: Changes in exchange rates affect the cost of exports and imports. A weaker domestic currency can make exports cheaper for foreign buyers and imports more expensive for domestic consumers, boosting net exports.
  • Global Economic Conditions: The overall state of the global economy impacts demand for a country's exports. Strong global growth can lead to increased demand for exports, while a slowdown can dampen export demand.

It's essential to understand how these factors can change over time and influence the components of aggregate demand. Policymakers and economists closely monitor these factors to assess and respond to fluctuations in aggregate demand, as it significantly impacts economic growth and stability.


The Aggregate Demand (AD) function slopes downward from left to right due to the wealth effect, the interest rate effect, and the international trade effect. These factors are fundamental to understanding the relationship between the price level and the quantity of goods and services demanded in an economy.

1. Wealth Effect: As the price level falls, the real value of money increases. Consumers feel wealthier with their purchasing power now able to buy more goods and services. As a result, they tend to increase their overall spending, leading to a higher quantity of goods and services demanded at lower price levels.

Example: Suppose the price level decreases, and the cost of goods and services declines. Consumers find that they can now buy more products with the same amount of money, and as a result, their purchasing power increases. They might decide to buy additional goods or increase their consumption, leading to an upward shift in aggregate demand.

2. Interest Rate Effect: When the price level falls, the demand for money decreases. As a result, interest rates tend to decline to encourage borrowing and spending. Lower interest rates make it more attractive for businesses and consumers to invest and spend, increasing overall economic activity and aggregate demand.

Example: When prices decrease, people need less money to make the same purchases. As the demand for money falls, the central bank may reduce interest rates to encourage borrowing and spending. Lower interest rates can boost investment and consumption, contributing to an upward-sloping AD curve.

3. International Trade Effect: A decrease in the price level makes domestic goods relatively cheaper compared to foreign goods. As a result, foreign buyers tend to increase their demand for domestic exports, while domestic consumers may reduce their purchases of more expensive foreign imports. The net result is an increase in net exports, leading to a higher quantity of goods and services demanded.

Example: As the price level falls in a country, its exports become more competitively priced in international markets. This encourages foreign buyers to purchase more of the country's exports. Additionally, domestic consumers may prefer cheaper domestically produced goods over relatively more expensive imports, leading to an increase in net exports.

Combining these effects, a decrease in the price level stimulates consumer spending, investment, and net exports, leading to a higher aggregate demand. Conversely, an increase in the price level reduces consumers' purchasing power, leads to higher interest rates, and potentially dampens foreign demand for domestic goods, resulting in a lower aggregate demand. This negative relationship between the price level and aggregate demand is reflected in the downward-sloping AD curve.

---


Changes in the components of Aggregate Demand (AD) directly impact the overall level of AD in an economy. Each component of AD - consumption (C), investment (I), government spending (G), and net exports (X-M) - plays a crucial role in shaping the total demand for goods and services. Let's explore how changes in these components affect the level of AD:

1. Consumption (C):

  • Increase in Consumption: When consumers increase their spending on goods and services, it leads to a rise in consumption expenditures, which directly adds to AD. This is particularly significant as consumption is the largest component of AD in most economies. For example, during festive seasons or when households feel more optimistic about the economy, consumer spending tends to increase, driving up AD.

  • Decrease in Consumption: Conversely, if consumers reduce their spending due to factors like economic uncertainty or a decrease in disposable income, it will lead to a decline in consumption expenditures and a decrease in AD.

2. Investment (I):

  • Increase in Investment: When businesses increase their spending on capital goods, such as machinery, equipment, and factories, it boosts investment expenditures, contributing to higher AD. For instance, during periods of economic expansion or when businesses expect strong future demand, they are more likely to invest, raising AD.

  • Decrease in Investment: If businesses cut back on investment due to factors like economic recession or reduced profitability, it will result in lower investment expenditures, leading to a decrease in AD.

3. Government Spending (G):

  • Increase in Government Spending: When the government increases its spending on infrastructure projects, education, healthcare, and other public goods and services, it directly adds to AD. This is a key tool used by governments to stimulate economic activity during downturns or invest in long-term growth.

  • Decrease in Government Spending: If the government reduces its spending, it will lead to a decrease in government expenditures and a decrease in AD.

4. Net Exports (X-M):

  • Increase in Net Exports: When a country's exports exceed its imports (trade surplus), it results in a positive contribution to AD. An increase in foreign demand for domestic goods or a decrease in domestic demand for foreign imports can lead to a rise in net exports, boosting AD.

  • Decrease in Net Exports: On the other hand, when a country's imports exceed its exports (trade deficit), it leads to a negative contribution to AD. A decrease in foreign demand for domestic goods or an increase in domestic demand for foreign imports will reduce net exports and decrease AD.

Overall, changes in the components of AD can either increase or decrease the total level of AD in an economy. These changes are crucial for understanding and managing economic fluctuations and can be influenced by various economic factors, policy decisions, and external events. Policymakers often use fiscal and monetary measures to influence these components and stabilize AD to achieve sustainable economic growth and stability.


---

The above components of Aggregate Demand (AD) do not always rise or fall together. They can exhibit different trends based on various economic factors, conditions, and external events. The common trends among the components of AD include:

1. Consumption (C):

  • Positive Correlation: Consumption tends to have a positive correlation with overall economic growth. During periods of economic expansion, when incomes rise, consumer confidence is high, and interest rates are low, consumption expenditures typically increase. Similarly, during recessions or economic slowdowns, consumption tends to decline as households become cautious about spending.

2. Investment (I):

  • Pro-Cyclical Nature: Investment is highly pro-cyclical, meaning it closely follows the overall business cycle. During economic upturns and periods of optimism, businesses are more willing to invest in expanding production capacity and improving efficiency. In contrast, during downturns, businesses tend to reduce investment to cut costs and conserve capital.

3. Government Spending (G):

  • Counter-Cyclical Nature: Government spending is often counter-cyclical, meaning it moves in the opposite direction to the business cycle. During economic downturns, governments may increase spending on infrastructure projects, unemployment benefits, and other forms of stimulus to boost economic activity and support citizens. Conversely, during strong economic periods, governments may reduce spending to prevent overheating and inflation.

4. Net Exports (X-M):

  • Inverse Relationship with Domestic Economic Conditions: Net exports are influenced by the relative strength of a country's economy compared to its trading partners. When a country's economy is growing faster than its trading partners, its exports may increase, leading to a rise in net exports. Conversely, when a country's economy slows down relative to its trading partners, its imports may increase, leading to a decrease in net exports.

It's important to note that these trends are general patterns and can be influenced by a range of factors, including fiscal and monetary policy, exchange rates, global economic conditions, and consumer and business sentiments. Additionally, unexpected events, such as natural disasters or geopolitical tensions, can disrupt these trends and lead to unexpected changes in the components of AD.