Search This Blog

Showing posts with label interest rate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label interest rate. Show all posts

Saturday, 27 July 2024

India's Middle Class comes armed with Entitlement and little Gratitude

From Girish Menon

Modiji phones Nirmala Sitharaman, 'Nirmalaji, yeh madhyam varg kyon ro rahen hai?

Nirmala: Sir, in Mussalmano ko rone do, Kuch dere ke baad chup ho jayenge'.

Modi: 'Kya matlab? Inme koi Mussalman nahi hai'

Nirmala: Sir, yeh log hamare Mussaalman hai. Mera matlab hum kuch bhi kare aur chunav time par bole ki Hindu khatren mein hai to yeh kamal par angootha lag denge.

Modi: Ha, ha, main bhool gaya tha! Lage raho Nirmalaji.

---
Shekhar Gupta in The Print

With her latest Budget, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman has walked into the nastiest of all hornets’ nests: the Great Indian Middle Class.

Through the week, she and her ministry have been pilloried on social media. Those in the mainstream media are dismayed, but more measured.

There can be reasonable, pragmatic, ideological, and even moral arguments against the new, Thomas Piketty-esque (soak the rich, especially when they earn from their accumulated wealth) changes in the capital gains taxes. It doesn’t justify the kind of outrage it has unleashed, with hundreds of furious, often personalised, memes.

Did the Modi government fail to read the minds of its most valuable constituency, the (mostly Hindu) middle class? Or did it take it too much for granted? In an earlier National Interest published on 6 July, 2019, we had argued that the middle classes were like the Modi BJP’s Muslims.

That somewhat cheeky formulation was drawn from how the government continued to collect more and more by way of taxes on petrol and diesel to fund its humongous programme of direct benefit transfers to the poor. It was a kind of innovative Robin Hood politics. Take from the middle class and give to the poor.

It made the poor, who constitute a vast majority of voters, happy. And if the middle class was fretting, so be it. They were going to vote for the BJP anyway. Our argument was that the BJP could take the middle-class votes for granted like the ‘secular’ parties with the Muslims.

Will this change now? I guess not. This fury will blow over, probably as some ‘corrections’, especially on indexing, are made, and buttons more significant than taxes are pushed: nationalism, religion, the Gandhi family. The usual mix. Many of those ranting now will continue to vote for the BJP. They are not disaffected with Modi, his party, or its ideology. They adore all three. At this point, they are simply like slighted lovers.

What the Modi government got wrong with this Budget and in its economic signalling is in moving away from its generally upbeat, ‘India is on the rise, growth will get steeper, markets are red hot and will get redder’ messaging. A sobering signal from the Budget, if sensible and prudent, is a bummer for the faithful.

The middle class, however, is addicted to good news, hype, even gratitude, and believe each Budget should make them more money.

What they did not want to be told instead was: ‘Listen, guys, you’ve made a lot, especially in the decade’s boom. It’s time you paid back a bit more.’ And maybe that it wasn’t quite virtuous to make even more money on your accumulated wealth.

The rich won’t bother. The middle class, especially those in the lower half of this large socio-economic section who took large EMIs, bought second homes as investments, moved their savings from RBI-guaranteed bank fixed deposits to stocks, mutual funds and debt bonds, are the ones kicking at the government’s shins.

Many of them might’ve lived with increased taxation. They love Narendra Modi and his larger politics enough to be willing to pay some price for it. After all, more than a crore of them gave up their LPG subsidy on his ‘give it up’ call. What’s taken them by surprise is the change in messaging. They probably see this as being told that they’ve done something immoral, made too much money, and the state is reining them back in.

Since reform began in the summer of 1991, successive governments and finance ministers have had one consistent focus: driving those with any financial surpluses towards the markets. That is why capital gains tax breaks were brought in and expanded over these decades. The markets said ‘thank you’, boomed, and rewarded the governments of the day.

Every government in these 33 years, especially the current one, has celebrated the rising number of mutual fund folios, demat accounts and rising indices. Some of the recent nudges, beginning with action on the debt bonds in the 2023 Budget, seem to be directed at bringing the same surplus-generating classes back to bank deposits. They were not ready for it.

Just what is India’s middle class? A lifestyle approach is too amorphous, anecdotal. Do the income tax payers make this middle class? The number of those who actually pay taxes, less than a third of those who file returns (2.2 crore out of 7.4) will not even be a fraction of what has long been on the way to becoming the world’s largest middle class.

It might be safer, instead, to think about what this middle class wants. It wants, and definitely expects, India to be the hottest economy in the world, a leader in fields ranging from economics to science, sports to the military, manufacturing to software, and of course all this with a historically mandated right to sermonise to the world.

They may not use the expression, but they do not dispute the claim or at least the ambition of being vishwaguru. They love to believe the West is in decline and India’s time has come. If I were to record one video saying the dollar is on its last legs, that American power is in terminal decline, that Europe is finished, it would be bound to go viral. Never mind the facts. The scene that most characterises this middle-class mood is enacted every sunset at the Wagah border flag lowering.

Those are the expectations with which they keep voting for Modi/BJP. They see their own growing wealth, the market boom, the world coming to invest in India, as elements in the same package. Ideally, of course, they’d want to achieve all this while paying no taxes. Or Singapore-level taxes. They’d be OK with Singapore-level democracy as well. Now they’re being told to return to bank fixed deposits!

Since it is tempting to get ahead of myself, I will stop here. Let’s just say we still do not know what the middle class is and what it wants. Let’s stick to what we know the Indian middle class isn’t. That is, being grateful.

The heat the Modi government is feeling will cool down soon. But name the one person who’s done more than any other Indian across three generations to create, expand and enrich this new middle class. By deregulating, burning the licence-quota raj, opening imports, cutting taxes and tariffs, and pushing the same middle class towards the markets with generous tax incentives.

Then let us ask who’s the one leader the same middle class has detested most of all since, say, 2011. You’ve guessed right. He is Dr Manmohan Singh. In 1999, he and his party checked out his popularity in India’s most middle-class constituency by fielding him for the Lok Sabha in South Delhi. He lost. What did they expect? A thank-you vote? He’s only got contempt instead. This middle class comes armed with entitlement, not burdened with gratitude.

Wednesday, 26 July 2023

A Level Economics: Practice Questions on Monetary Policy


  1. What is the primary objective of the Bank of England's monetary policy? a) Promoting economic growth b) Ensuring financial stability c) Maintaining price stability (inflation targeting) d) Managing exchange rates Answer: c

  2. The Bank of England operates under a ____________ framework, aiming to achieve a specific target for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation. a) Financial Stability b) Exchange Rate Targeting c) Inflation Targeting d) Full Employment Policy Answer: c

  3. Which committee of the Bank of England is responsible for making decisions on monetary policy, including setting the Bank Rate? a) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) b) Financial Policy Committee (FPC) c) Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) d) Inflation Targeting Committee (ITC) Answer: a

  4. What does the "lender of last resort" role of the Bank of England entail? a) Providing emergency liquidity assistance to financial institutions facing funding difficulties b) Setting interest rates to control inflation c) Regulating and supervising financial institutions d) Overseeing the smooth functioning of payment systems Answer: a

  5. The Bank of England's inflation target is set at: a) 1% Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation b) 3% Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation c) 5% Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation d) 2% Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation Answer: d

  6. The Bank of England's subsidiary responsible for supervising banks and financial institutions is: a) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) b) Financial Policy Committee (FPC) c) Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) d) Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Answer: c

  7. Which of the following is a factor considered by the Bank of England when setting interest rates? a) Global Economic Environment b) Exchange Rate Targeting c) Government Spending d) Housing Market Conditions Answer: a

  8. The symmetrical nature of the Bank of England's inflation target means that: a) The Bank aims for inflation to be below the target b) The Bank aims for inflation to be above the target c) The Bank treats deviations of inflation below the target more seriously than deviations above the target d) The Bank treats deviations of inflation above the target with the same importance as deviations below the target Answer: d

  9. How does lowering interest rates typically affect consumer spending? a) It encourages more borrowing and higher spending b) It discourages borrowing and reduces spending c) It has no impact on consumer behavior d) It leads to fluctuations in consumer spending Answer: a

  10. Changes in interest rates can influence the exchange rate by: a) Increasing inflation expectations b) Attracting foreign investors seeking higher returns c) Encouraging carry trades d) Reducing the interest rate differential between countries Answer: b


  1. What is the primary goal of Quantitative Easing (QE) by central banks? a) Reducing inflation b) Controlling exchange rates c) Stimulating the economy and increasing money supply d) Lowering short-term interest rates Answer: c

  2. How does the interest rate differential between two countries influence exchange rates? a) Higher interest rates lead to currency depreciation b) Higher interest rates lead to currency appreciation c) Lower interest rates lead to currency depreciation d) Lower interest rates lead to currency appreciation Answer: b

  3. Which of the following is a risk associated with Quantitative Easing (QE)? a) Deflationary pressures b) Asset price bubbles c) Reduced money supply d) Increased interest rates Answer: b

  4. What is the purpose of Funding for Lending (FLS) by central banks? a) Providing low-cost funding to households b) Encouraging banks to increase lending activity c) Controlling inflation through lending restrictions d) Supporting government spending Answer: b

  5. What is the objective of Forward Guidance by central banks? a) Controlling exchange rates through communication b) Lowering long-term interest rates c) Reducing inflation expectations d) Providing clarity on future monetary policy to influence borrowing decisions Answer: d

  6. In the context of direct intervention, what does TLTRO stand for? a) Targeted Long-Term Reserve Operations b) Timing of Long-Term Rate Offerings c) Targeted Long-Term Refinancing Operations d) Term Limit for Long-Term Reserves Answer: c

  7. What happens when a central bank implements negative interest rates on banks' reserves? a) Banks increase lending activity b) Banks pay interest on reserves held at the central bank c) Banks hold excess reserves to earn higher interest d) Banks reduce lending activity Answer: a

  8. What is one potential unintended consequence of direct intervention measures by central banks? a) Increased inflation b) Reduced market liquidity c) Higher interest rates d) Excessive risk-taking or asset price bubbles Answer: d

  9. How can central banks adjust Funding for Lending (FLS) to enhance its effectiveness? a) Increase short-term interest rates b) Reduce the amount of low-cost funding provided to banks c) Implement negative interest rates d) Periodically review and make adjustments to the scheme Answer: d

  10. Which of the following is the primary objective of Quantitative Easing (QE)? a) Boosting borrowing and spending in the economy b) Controlling exchange rates c) Reducing government spending d) Encouraging saving and investment Answer: a


--- Essay Questions

  1. "Assess the Effectiveness and Risks of Quantitative Easing (QE) as a Monetary Policy Tool."


    • Analyze the role of QE in stimulating economic growth, increasing money supply, and supporting financial markets.
    • Evaluate the potential risks associated with prolonged QE, such as asset price bubbles and inflationary pressures.
    • Consider the challenges faced by central banks in unwinding QE and transitioning to a more conventional monetary policy stance.

  2. "Discuss the Impact of Central Bank Interventions on Exchange Rates and Economic Stability."


    • Analyze the relationship between interest rates and exchange rates, emphasizing the role of interest rate differentials and capital flows.
    • Evaluate the effectiveness of direct intervention methods, including Funding for Lending (FLS) and Forward Guidance, in influencing lending activity and economic growth.
    • Discuss the potential risks of central bank interventions on economic stability, including the impact on asset prices and financial market behavior.

  3. "Compare and Contrast Quantitative Easing (QE) and Interest Rate Policies as Tools of Monetary Control."


    • Analyze the objectives and mechanisms of QE and interest rate policies, focusing on how they influence money supply and borrowing costs.
    • Compare the impact of QE and interest rate policies on inflation, exchange rates, and overall economic activity.
    • Evaluate the strengths and limitations of each policy tool, considering their effectiveness in various economic contexts and potential risks to financial stability.

 

Sunday, 23 July 2023

A Level Economics 93: Floating Exchange Rates

Exchange Rate Systems:

An exchange rate system is the mechanism by which a country's currency is valued in terms of another currency or a basket of currencies. There are three primary types of exchange rate systems:

  1. Fixed Exchange Rate System: In a fixed exchange rate system, the central bank or government intervenes in the foreign exchange market to maintain a constant exchange rate between its currency and another currency. The rate is usually set at a specific value, and the central bank buys or sells its currency to keep it within the target range.

  2. Floating Exchange Rate System: In a free-float or floating exchange rate system, the exchange rate is determined by the forces of demand and supply in the foreign exchange market. The central bank does not intervene to influence the exchange rate, allowing it to fluctuate based on market conditions.

  3. Managed Exchange Rate System: In a managed exchange rate system, the central bank occasionally intervenes in the foreign exchange market to influence the exchange rate. However, it still allows the exchange rate to float within a certain range.

Free-Floating Exchange Rate System and Determination of Exchange Rate: In a free-float system, the exchange rate is determined solely by market forces of demand and supply in the foreign exchange market. When the demand for a currency exceeds its supply, its value appreciates relative to other currencies. Conversely, if the supply of a currency exceeds its demand, its value depreciates.

Demand for a Currency: The demand for a currency is driven by several factors:

  1. Exports: A country's exports increase the demand for its currency as foreign buyers need to convert their currency into the local currency to pay for the goods and services.

  2. Capital Inflows: Investments and capital inflows into a country create demand for its currency as investors need to buy the local currency to make investments.

Supply of a Currency: The supply of a currency is influenced by:

  1. Imports: When a country imports goods and services, it needs to buy foreign currencies, increasing the supply of its own currency in the foreign exchange market.

  2. Capital Outflows: When local investors invest abroad or foreign investors divest from the country, the supply of the local currency increases in the foreign exchange market.

Factors Affecting Exchange Rate Fluctuations: Several factors can cause exchange rates to appreciate or depreciate:

  1. Interest Rates: Higher interest rates in a country attract foreign investors seeking better returns, increasing demand for the local currency and leading to appreciation.

  2. Quantitative Easing (QE): Large-scale QE measures by a central bank can devalue a currency by increasing the money supply, leading to depreciation.

  3. Trade Flows: Trade imbalances, such as higher exports than imports, can lead to an appreciation of a country's currency due to increased demand.

  4. Confidence: Positive economic indicators and political stability can attract foreign investment, leading to a stronger currency.

  5. Safe-Haven Issues: In times of global uncertainty, investors may seek safe-haven assets, leading to appreciation of currencies perceived as safe havens.

  6. Speculation: Speculative trading in the foreign exchange market can influence short-term fluctuations in exchange rates.

Impacts of Exchange Rate Changes on Policy Objectives: Exchange rate changes can have several impacts on policy objectives:

  1. Inflation: A depreciation of the currency may lead to higher import prices, potentially contributing to inflation.

  2. Trade Balance: A weaker currency can improve a country's trade balance as exports become cheaper for foreign buyers and imports become more expensive for domestic consumers.

  3. Interest Rates: Exchange rate changes may influence central bank decisions on interest rates, especially in countries with inflation targeting regimes.

Microeconomic Effects of Exchange Rate Changes: Exchange rate changes can have microeconomic effects on households and firms:

  1. Purchasing Power: A depreciation can reduce the purchasing power of households as imported goods become more expensive.

  2. Exporters and Importers: Export-oriented firms benefit from a weaker currency as their products become more competitive in international markets, while importers face higher costs.

  3. Foreign Debt: Firms with foreign debt may face increased repayment burdens if the domestic currency depreciates.

In conclusion, in a free-float exchange rate system, the exchange rate is determined by demand and supply in the foreign exchange market. Various factors, such as interest rates, trade flows, and speculation, influence exchange rate fluctuations. Exchange rate changes can have significant impacts on policy objectives, inflation, trade balance, and interest rates, as well as microeconomic effects on households and firms. Governments and policymakers need to carefully consider these effects when formulating monetary and fiscal policies.

---

Exchange Rate Systems and Determination of Exchange Rate: Real World Example: In 1971, the United States abandoned the fixed exchange rate system known as the Bretton Woods system. Under this system, the US dollar was pegged to gold, and other major currencies were pegged to the US dollar. However, mounting economic pressures and a trade deficit led to an inability to maintain the fixed exchange rates. The US then shifted to a floating exchange rate system, where the value of the dollar is determined by market forces.

Demand for a Currency: During the global financial crisis of 2008, there was a surge in demand for safe-haven currencies, including the Swiss Franc and Japanese Yen. Investors sought refuge in these currencies as they were perceived to be more stable than others during the economic turmoil.

Supply of a Currency: In 2016, the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union (Brexit). This decision led to uncertainties and concerns about the UK's economic prospects, causing a depreciation of the British Pound. The increased supply of the Pound in the foreign exchange market resulted from capital outflows and reduced confidence in the UK economy.

Factors Affecting Exchange Rate Fluctuations: Real World Example: In March 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, central banks worldwide implemented aggressive quantitative easing measures to support their economies. The Federal Reserve in the US, the European Central Bank, and others expanded their balance sheets by purchasing assets and injecting money into the financial system. These measures increased the money supply, leading to depreciation of several major currencies against safe-haven assets like the US Dollar.

Impacts of Exchange Rate Changes on Policy Objectives: Real World Example: In 2013, Japan introduced aggressive monetary policies under the leadership of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, a strategy known as "Abenomics." The Bank of Japan pursued massive quantitative easing to fight deflation and devalue the Yen to boost exports. This policy aimed to increase inflation, boost economic growth, and improve Japan's trade balance.

Microeconomic Effects of Exchange Rate Changes: Real World Example: When the British Pound depreciated significantly following the Brexit vote in 2016, UK consumers experienced an increase in the cost of imported goods and services. This depreciation led to inflationary pressures, impacting the purchasing power of households.

Conclusion: Exchange rate systems play a crucial role in determining the value of a country's currency in international markets. Factors such as interest rates, trade flows, confidence, and speculation influence exchange rate fluctuations. Policymakers must consider the impacts of exchange rate changes on policy objectives, inflation, trade balance, and interest rates, as well as the microeconomic effects on households and firms. Exchange rate movements can have significant implications for economic stability and competitiveness, making exchange rate management an essential aspect of economic policymaking.

---

Real-World Examples:

  1. Brexit and the GBP: When the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union (Brexit) in 2016, uncertainty surrounding the UK's economic future led to a sharp depreciation of the British Pound (GBP) against major currencies. The demand for GBP decreased due to concerns over potential trade disruptions and reduced foreign investment, resulting in a depreciation of the currency.


  2. US-China Trade War and CNY: During the US-China trade war, the Chinese Yuan (CNY) depreciated against the US Dollar (USD) as the Chinese government allowed the currency to adjust in response to US tariffs on Chinese goods. The CNY's depreciation aimed to mitigate the impact of tariffs on Chinese exports and maintain the competitiveness of Chinese products in international markets.


  3. Financial Crisis in Argentina: In 2018-2019, Argentina faced a severe currency crisis, leading to a significant depreciation of the Argentine Peso (ARS). High inflation, fiscal imbalances, and a lack of foreign exchange reserves contributed to the depreciation of the currency.


  4. Swiss Franc (CHF) and Safe-Haven Demand: The Swiss Franc is often considered a safe-haven currency. During periods of global uncertainty, such as the 2008 financial crisis or geopolitical tensions, investors tend to flock to the CHF, leading to an appreciation of the currency.


  5. Japan's Intervention in the Yen (JPY): In the past, the Bank of Japan intervened in the foreign exchange market to weaken the Japanese Yen. This was done to boost Japan's export competitiveness and support the economy during periods of economic slowdown.


  6. COVID-19 Pandemic and AUD: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted global economies, including Australia. As Australia is a major commodity exporter, reduced demand for its commodities from countries like China led to a depreciation of the Australian Dollar (AUD) against major currencies.


  7. Interest Rate Differentials and NZD: Interest rate differentials between countries can influence exchange rates. For example, if the Reserve Bank of New Zealand raises interest rates while other central banks keep rates steady, the New Zealand Dollar (NZD) may appreciate as investors seek higher yields.


  8. India's Economic Reforms and INR: India implemented economic reforms to attract foreign investment and improve its business climate. As a result, the Indian Rupee (INR) appreciated against major currencies as foreign investors showed confidence in India's economic prospects.


  9. European Debt Crisis and Euro (EUR): During the European debt crisis, concerns over the stability of some Eurozone economies led to a depreciation of the Euro. Investors sought safe-haven assets, causing the Euro to weaken against major currencies.


  10. Sovereign Debt Defaults and Currency Depreciation: When a country faces sovereign debt defaults or credit downgrades, it can lead to a depreciation of its currency as investors lose confidence in the country's financial stability. For example, Argentina experienced significant currency depreciation during its debt crises.

---

An exchange rate index, also known as a trade-weighted exchange rate index or currency basket, is a measure that reflects the value of a country's currency relative to a group of foreign currencies. It is used to track and compare the overall strength or weakness of a country's currency against its major trading partners.

The exchange rate index is calculated using a weighted average of exchange rates between the domestic currency and the currencies of the country's major trading partners. Each currency in the index is given a specific weight based on its importance in the country's trade. Typically, the weight of a currency in the index is determined by the volume of trade between the two countries.

For example, suppose a country's major trading partners are the United States, the Eurozone, China, and Japan. The exchange rate index for this country would be a weighted average of the exchange rates between its domestic currency and the US Dollar, Euro, Chinese Yuan, and Japanese Yen.

By using an exchange rate index, policymakers and economists can better assess the overall value of a country's currency relative to its trading partners, rather than focusing on the exchange rate against a single currency. This index helps to provide a more comprehensive view of the currency's performance and its impact on international trade and competitiveness.

Exchange rate indices are useful tools for understanding the effectiveness of a country's monetary and exchange rate policies, assessing the impact of currency movements on trade balances, and analyzing trends in international competitiveness over time.

Let's consider a hypothetical example of an exchange rate index for a country with three major trading partners: the United States (USD), the European Union (EUR), and China (CNY). We will assume that the weights of these currencies in the index are 40%, 30%, and 30%, respectively, based on the volume of trade between the country and its trading partners.

Suppose the exchange rates of the domestic currency (DC) against each of the major currencies are as follows:

  1. Exchange Rate of DC to USD: 1 DC = 0.75 USD
  2. Exchange Rate of DC to EUR: 1 DC = 0.85 EUR
  3. Exchange Rate of DC to CNY: 1 DC = 6.50 CNY

To calculate the exchange rate index, we use the weighted average formula:

Exchange Rate Index = (Weight of USD * Exchange Rate of DC to USD) + (Weight of EUR * Exchange Rate of DC to EUR) + (Weight of CNY * Exchange Rate of DC to CNY)

Exchange Rate Index = (0.40 * 0.75) + (0.30 * 0.85) + (0.30 * 6.50)

Exchange Rate Index = 0.30 + 0.255 + 1.95

Exchange Rate Index = 2.505

In this example, the exchange rate index for the country is 2.505. This value represents the overall strength or weakness of the country's currency relative to its major trading partners, taking into account the trade volumes with each partner and the exchange rates against their respective currencies.

If the exchange rate index increases over time, it indicates that the country's currency has appreciated against its major trading partners' currencies, making its exports relatively more expensive and imports relatively cheaper. On the other hand, a decrease in the exchange rate index suggests that the country's currency has depreciated, making its exports more competitive and imports more expensive.